The Evaluation of 32n State-funded Out-of-School Time Programs in Michigan
Overview

The Evaluation of 32n State-funded Out-of-School Time Programs in Michigan

Michigan’s 32n Out-of-School Time (OST) Grants Program is a major statewide initiative designed to expand access to high-quality learning and enrichment opportunities outside of regular school hours. Since its launch in 2021, the program has grown rapidly, supported by significant state investment, increased statewide access to high-quality programming, and a clear policy focus on improving outcomes for K-12 youth.

The program plays a dual role: supporting positive youth development while also addressing broader economic and community needs. By providing safe, structured, and engaging learning environments during out-of-school hours, OST programs help improve academic engagement, develop soft skills, and create pathways for long-term success. At the same time, they enable caregivers to maintain stable employment by offering reliable and affordable childcare options during before-school, after-school and summer periods. These combined benefits make the program a critical support system for both families and communities across the state.

Guided by MiLEAP, Michigan Afterschool Partnership and Michigan Out-of-School Time advisory committee, 32n OST Grant programs’ strong emphasis on equity ensured that resources were directed toward under-resourced communities where access to such opportunities is often limited. Despite this progress, demand continues to exceed available funding, highlighting both the value of the program and the ongoing need for expansion.

2024-25 Key Highlights

  • Scale & Investment:
    Over $60 million invested, supporting 171 grantees and 782 program sites, serving 89,000+ youth statewide.
  • Access & Equity:
    59% of program sites located in under-resourced communities, with balanced geographic distribution across urban, suburban, and rural areas.
  • Program Quality:
    91% of youth enjoyed attending programs and 97% of families felt supported, reflecting strong satisfaction and strong community engagement.
  • Youth Outcomes:
    Caregivers reported that regular participation was linked to improvements in school behavior and the development of soft skills.
  • Family Impact:
    Over half of families reported that they would need to find or pay for alternative care in the absence of these programs.
  • Key Challenges:
    Staffing shortages, transportation barriers, and increasing youth mental health and family needs continued to impact program delivery.

For more information: